Business Insights

Articles, news and upcoming events

The Worlds of Facility Management and Workplace are, by definition, highly mobile and evolutive.

On these pages, you will find technical articles, news, reports on congresses and conferences in which Spaceonmove took part as well as positions or “mood tickets” which should give you a particular insight into these two fields. Nice readings.

Ethical or social management?

Management is a key lever for guiding behaviour, structuring relationships within organizations and guaranteeing performance. In this context, the concepts of ethical management and social management occupy a central place. Although they share the same idea of humanist and responsible management, they have different objectives and principles.

Ethical management: values-based governance

Ethical management is based on the integration of moral values and ethical principles into decision-making and business conduct. It is not simply a matter of complying with the law, but of promoting practices aligned with principles such as fairness, transparency, responsibility and respect for stakeholders. Ethical management requires constant reflection on the impact of decisions, not only on economic results, but also on employees, customers, suppliers and society at large.

A concrete example of ethical management could be the implementation of clear anti-discrimination policies, or the refusal to contract with partners with dubious practices, even if this implies an economic cost. Ethics go beyond guiding behaviour in the name of universal values.

Ethical management is also distinguished by its individual approach. It seeks to empower managers and employees in their role as citizens within the organization. Put another way, it’s about doing the right thing, even when no-one’s watching.

Social management: an approach focused on collective well-being

For its part, social management is an approach that aims to improve the quality of life at work, strengthen social cohesion and foster employee commitment. This approach focuses on the social and human dimensions of the organization, with particular attention paid to the health, safety, inclusion and professional development of employees.

In concrete terms, social management translates into actions such as telecommuting policies, psychosocial risk prevention programs, and work-life balance support.

Social management is not just about ensuring a pleasant working climate. It also aims to transform professional relations into drivers of collective performance.

Fundamental differences: distinct objectives and logics

The main difference between ethical management and social management lies in their respective objectives and approaches. Ethical management focuses more on philosophical and moral principles and is often outward-looking (relations with society, the environment or customers), whereas social management takes a pragmatic approach, focusing on employees and their well-being.

Thus, an organization can practice effective social management while neglecting ethical dimensions (for example, by having respectful internal practices but adopting an aggressive, unethical business strategy). Of course, the opposite is also possible.

A necessary complementarity

In a responsible organization, ethical management and social management are not in opposition, but complement each other. Ethical management provides a moral framework and a long-term vision, while social management is rooted in concrete actions to improve working conditions. Together, they contribute to building high-performance, attractive and sustainable organizations.

For managers, it is crucial to navigate between these two dimensions, adopting practices that value individuals while respecting sound ethical principles. By combining these approaches, they reinforce not only internal cohesion, but also the reputation and legitimacy of their orga

Recent posts

  • Large companies: identifying with a project…

    Large companies are often faced with a major challenge when it comes to projects: how to ensure that members identify with them, personify them, live them and carry them emotionally. The most direct answer would be to say that the project must be sufficiently interesting and self-sufficient for the people involved to support it. Naturally, this is a bit short-sighted and, above all, inaccurate. To put it simply, first, a member of the company’s senior management must be the real ambassador for the project, talking about it enthusiastically, encouraging the teams and the beneficiaries of the project and acting as an advocate for the cause with the board of directors, even when clouds gather, or challenges arise. In many cases, projects go well, even very well, thanks to the technical skills and the various internal and external networks, but they often lack the real ‘soul’ to make them unique, unforgettable and convey a message. How many projects have I seen or taken part in that were successful, but left me with no real satisfaction or sense of belonging? Without getting into a philosophical debate: do company managers really want this ‘attachment’ to a project? Having observed some of the reactions and heard some of the comments made by senior managers, my answer is clearly ‘no’, even if it is distressing.

  • Empathy, resilience and the festive season

    Geopolitical, economic and societal challenges and disasters of all kinds once again punctuated 2024, transforming what should be a harmonious and happy life desired by and for most people into difficult, demanding and even terrible moments. Certain despots and dictators have once again darkened the skies in many countries when their populations most certainly did not want them to. This lack of empathy on the part of some of the world’s top leaders, who are condemning the vast majority of the world’s people to survival or to wandering in nauseating and terrible unknowns, is not acceptable, even if we haven’t moved a single step forward when we said that, unfortunately… The major aid bodies and organisations are being flouted, and the minimum of respect for others no longer seems to exist, as the life of a human being no longer seems to count for anything. Added to this are the natural disasters that are indicative of the climate disruption we have caused. Is it still reasonable to hope for a little empathy and resilience, at least during the festive season? To give up these festive moments, which are certainly sometimes commercial, would be to capitulate to the barbarism of a minority of dangerous egomaniacs.

  • Antinomy between workplace flexibility and resource management

    Workspace management, particularly in the service sector, seems increasingly marked by a form of collective frenzy. A new divide is emerging between senior executives who are demanding a return to the office after the pandemic to better control their teams, and those who are adopting a tolerant approach.

    Each has its own line of argument, citing statistics from the media and polling institutes to denounce the flaws in the opposing “system”, while neglecting the middle way of “at the same time”, which seems to work well in many cases. Why have we reached this point? It would be difficult to give a definitive answer to this question, but we can safely draw a parallel with the evolution of the geopolitical world, which is becoming increasingly rigid and divisive.:

  • Conceptually right, operationally wrong

    The somewhat barbaric title of this column in fact conceals a reality that concerns a certain proportion, not to say a certain number, of companies: the concept is correct, but its implementation or marketing is “off the ground”. Let’s look at concepts that have reached a certain intellectual maturity but are not “taking off” in operational or commercial terms. (…)

    Certain “problems” of this type can also be found in the service sector, where processes and flows are correct but totally prohibitive.

  • Does true quality still exist?

    To imply that true quality no longer exists has an element of provocation about it. However, this is not an insignificant statement, because in many areas, quality of service in the emotional sense of the term has been transformed into ‘pseudo-quality’, which seems - and this is a pity - to suit a large proportion of the population who are ultimately undemanding.

    On closer examination, quality levels have risen sharply thanks solely to technologies and certain perfectly oiled and standardised processes. This improvement has made it possible, whether voluntarily or not, to reduce the quality of services delivered by employees. (…) Today, outside a closed circle of ‘top-of-the-range’ companies or businesses, service has often lost its credentials. For some managers, once the service has been delivered in accordance with the ‘contract’, the job is done, full stop. This is to forget that form is just as important as content, which no longer requires any effort thanks to technology, equipment and infrastructure, and above all no longer differentiates the product.

  • FM - Is long-term thinking still relevant?

    We know that there is such a thing as long time and short time, particularly in business, even if over the last ten years or so there has been a paradigm shift: long time seems to be disappearing in favour of short, or even very short, time.

    The pace of consumption and production, programmed obsolescence and economic models all play a major role in these changes. While this may make sense from a financial point of view, it is becoming increasingly difficult to think in the long term in the field of facility management (FM) and, more surprisingly, in the property sector.

    These two fields are working on investments that range from a minimum of 5 years for certain FM contracts to more than 20-30, or even 50, years for construction projects.

  • Workspace concepts and productivity…

    Do workspaces have an impact on productivity? To ask the question is to answer it, even if other factors, such as tools and technology, processes, skills delegation, etc. play an equally important role…

    New concepts in workspaces - which in fact are no longer very ‘new’ - are key factors in success, satisfaction and productivity. Allowing employees flexibility in a much more fluid environment than in the past is becoming a must, across all generations.

    However, looking at employee productivity solely in terms of workspaces seems a little short-sighted, although for some company managers, buying a few ‘attractive’ pieces of furniture from a discount store and repainting the cafeteria is already a giant leap into the future.

    Productivity in the workplace is very difficult to quantify, because the very definition varies from company to company. What’s more, there are countless parameters that come into play to increase or decrease productivity.

Contact us

Contact from
☛ Don't forget to include an email address or a phone number if you wish to be contacted.