Business Insights

Articles, news and upcoming events

The Worlds of Facility Management and Workplace are, by definition, highly mobile and evolutive.

On these pages, you will find technical articles, news, reports on congresses and conferences in which Spaceonmove took part as well as positions or “mood tickets” which should give you a particular insight into these two fields. Nice readings.

Project Management: A Lack of Foresight Leads to Mediocrity

Within the world of project management, one fundamental principle is widely recognised: insufficient preparation and anticipation almost invariably lead to disappointing outcomes. The Anglo-Saxon world captures this reality with the well-known expression: “Garbage in, garbage out.”

While this principle may appear self-evident, it is frequently overlooked within large organisations. Projects often suffer from inadequate planning, an excessive desire to accelerate delivery, weak governance, decisions driven more by intuition than by evidence, or budget reductions imposed during execution.

A project should never be improvised. It must be prepared methodically. Risks and opportunities need to be identified, project phases defined realistically, and financial, human and technical resources assessed with rigour.

How many projects are still launched without genuine strategic reflection being undertaken in advance, in a professional and transparent manner? Senior management is often under pressure to deliver results quickly, seeks answers before the necessary analysis has been completed, and expects more outcomes with fewer resources. This approach frequently leads to a predictable consequence: mediocrity.

Beyond the cost overruns and delays that poor preparation generally creates, such an approach can also generate significant frustration among project teams and managers. When an organisation fails to devote sufficient time to early-stage planning, it undermines the very foundations of success.

Every project, regardless of its nature, requires a minimum level of preparation and foresight. Before considering the traditional phases of project initiation, procurement, execution, monitoring and closure, one fundamental question must be addressed: what is the project intended to achieve?

What financial, technical, operational or reputational benefits are expected? What should the project deliver on its first day of operation? What value should it continue to generate in five, ten or even fifteen years’ time?

Project organisation then becomes a critical stage. Defining governance structures, responsibilities, working methods, available resources and budgets provides the essential framework upon which success depends.

Yet these principles represent some of the most basic standards of project management. In practice, many leadership teams struggle to adhere to them. They become involved in areas beyond their remit, challenge operational decisions, question technical expertise, and revisit judgements made by the very professionals appointed to deliver the project.

Trust in the competence of those involved remains a key success factor. As the saying goes, everyone should be allowed to fulfil their role and responsibilities. Effective governance relies on clear accountability, mutual respect for expertise, and the ability to delegate appropriately.

Anticipating potential scenarios, risks and opportunities is a continuous responsibility. However, once key decisions have been taken, they should remain in place unless exceptional circumstances arise. Last-minute changes are typically expensive, disruptive to teams, and often detrimental to the overall quality of the outcome.

There is a time for reflection, discussion and decision-making. There is also a time for execution. Once decisions have been properly evaluated and approved, continual interference and repeated challenges become counterproductive.

Having participated in and led numerous large-scale projects, I have observed that this distinction is not always respected. On the contrary, the growing tendency towards excessive inclusiveness, where everyone feels entitled to contribute to every decision, can slow decision-making processes and blur lines of accountability.

Perhaps it is time for senior leaders to reaffirm a fundamental principle: trust. Yet trust comes at a price. It requires a thorough understanding of the business, confidence in one’s teams, and a willingness to take responsibility for the decisions made.

Excellence in project management is achieved neither through haste nor improvisation. It is built on preparation, discipline and the ability to maintain a clear course from beginning to end.

Enjoy the read, and I wish you fruitful reflection.

Recent posts

  • Beyond Compliance: Rehabilitating Pragmatism in Business

    Under the pretext of compliance and norms, acute “control-itis” is spreading. While ethics are non-negotiable, demanding a binary world (all right or all wrong) stifles innovation and paralyzes action. SMEs, with thin margins, cannot afford this luxury where form kills substance. Should we really dissect every detail of an approved project or prioritize PowerPoint aesthetics over data? 4 Principles to Regain Efficiency: • Prioritize: Set critical points, allow flexibility on the rest. • Tolerate Approximation: When context permits. • Apply the 80/20 Rule: The cost of the remaining 20% is often disproportionate. • Accept Different Angles: Diverse approaches are a strength. Rehabilitating pragmatism isn’t a step backward; it’s a performance imperative. Where do you stand on the cursor between control and agility?

  • Beyond Performance: For a Management of Grandeur

    As my career draws to a close, I observe a critical flaw: our business schools and corporations teach power, aggressive growth, and domination, but often neglect greatness and empathy. We too often confuse “being strong” with “crushing others.” Yet, as the sages say, one does not rise by lowering others. The dictator model, whether political or corporate, has reached its limits. True leadership is about taking a step back, bringing teams along to success, and understanding differences. It is about rediscovering the spirit of the “senior banker” of the past: a cultural reference point, endowed with warmth and civic sense, who achieved goals without losing their humanity. Younger generations understand that this model is obsolete. Facing AI and new economic challenges, they will reinvent work by reintegrating common sense and cohesion where pure performance has failed.

  • AI: an asset, an attitude, and significant responsibilities

    Between promises of efficiency and risks of drift, Artificial Intelligence is divisive. Should we endure this revolution or steer it? My analysis is clear: passivity is not an option. For AI to remain a force for good, three pillars are essential: ✅ Transparency: Knowing when and how AI is used. ✅ Accountability: From the State to the citizen, everyone must act. ✅ Education: Training without constraining, protecting without banning. The challenge is not technological; it is ethical and societal. Let’s not allow the gap to widen between the initiated and the public.

  • Consistency Between Words and Actions: An Essential Driver of Engagement

    Words vs. Actions: The Trust Gap in Corporate Leadership

    Growing disillusionment in large companies often stems not from the work itself, but from a lack of coherence between leadership’s rhetoric and reality. Sophisticated communication strategies that withhold “ground truths” no longer convince; they breed suspicion and emotional detachment.

    Employees at all levels are fully aware of the company’s actual challenges. Treating them as incapable of understanding the stakes disregards their loyalty and competence. Whether for younger generations seeking purpose or experienced staff deserving respect, transparency is key.

    Leaders must abandon corporate jargon and embrace honest dialogue. Aligning words with actions isn’t just ethical; it’s the most effective lever for engagement, retention, and collective success.

  • From Loss of Meaning to Taking a Step Back: Management Challenges in Large Structures

    Dissatisfaction is rising in large structures. Why? Often due to a narrowing managerial vision and a loss of purpose in individual missions. While SMEs shine through their visibility and proximity, large groups must compensate with authentic communication and genuine empowerment.

    The core issue? The confusion between risk management and micromanagement. Just as you don’t make a good dish by counting peas in a tin, a manager doesn’t build a high-performing team through excessive control. The courage to assume a team’s errors and to look far ahead seems to have deserted some modern management curricula, leaving room for a culture of doing the “bare minimum” and employees hiding behind processes.

    Yet, taking a step back is not escaping reality. It is a powerful lever to: ✅ Restore meaning and motivation. ✅ Reconnect teams with the global strategy. ✅ Defuse often sterile debates.

    Knowing how to say thank you, showing enthusiasm, and owning one’s decisions are simple gestures that remain too rare. It is time to let teams breathe to better reach new heights

  • Plan when the weather is nice…

    We often hear that those who plan are ‘boring’, ‘fearful’ or that they waste their time planning for the unlikely. Yet recent crises (geopolitical, economic, health-related) brutally remind us of a truth: unpreparedness and naivety cost far more than foresight.

    Ironically, we all know how to anticipate in our daily lives. Who sets off for the mountains without equipment in stormy weather? Who doesn’t avoid a known traffic jam? So why does this clear-sightedness desert us when faced with more distant strategic challenges? Anticipating is not about enduring the future; it is about equipping oneself to navigate it with confidence.

    In business, this is a major responsibility for any leader or manager. It is not about eliminating all risks — to be an entrepreneur is to accept them — but about assessing them and preparing countermeasures before the house goes up in flames.

    A few simple habits to develop this ‘mental gymnastics’: ✅ Always present 2 or 3 options, even if only one is requested. ✅ Keep a few cards up your sleeve for ‘out-of-the-box’ questions. ✅ Anticipate objections and prepare your responses. ✅ Observe the (often instructive) reactions of your partners. ✅ Prepare for the unthinkable and for shifts in internal support.

    The aim is not to fall into paralysis by analysis or to stifle spontaneity. It is simply a matter of building the resilience needed to act with confidence when the storm hits.

  • AI in business: between strategic opportunity and the need for control

    Artificial Intelligence has quietly embedded itself into our organisations, evolving from discreet tools to omnipresent assistants. While its performance is impressive, its rapid adoption highlights a critical challenge: the generational divide. On one side, “AI natives” (Gen Z, Alpha) use it instinctively but often overlook its limitations. On the other, experienced generations can spot potential pitfalls but must still master the technical nuances. The risk? Waiting for a major financial scandal or a cyberattack to wake us up. Regulation is struggling to keep pace, leaving companies to navigate this normative cacophony alone. The question is no longer whether to integrate AI, but how to govern it intelligently. A resilient strategy and tailored training are no longer optional; they are survival imperatives. Moving forward is essential, but it must be done thoughtfully.

Contact us

Contact from
☛ Don't forget to include an email address or a phone number if you wish to be contacted.