Business Insights

Articles, news and upcoming events

The Worlds of Facility Management and Workplace are, by definition, highly mobile and evolutive.

On these pages, you will find technical articles, news, reports on congresses and conferences in which Spaceonmove took part as well as positions or “mood tickets” which should give you a particular insight into these two fields. Nice readings.

Good governance avoids so many pitfalls…

Posted on by Christian Hadorn | Article

Having strong governance may seem obvious. However, some companies still choose to ignore it, sometimes with indifference or condescension.

But what do we really mean by ‘good governance’? It refers to the set of rules, guidelines, processes and skills that ensure smooth operations, consistent decision-making, risk control and continuity in the company’s performance. So why do some organisations – including some of the most renowned – deprive themselves of this structuring framework? While it is impossible to objectively identify all the obstacles, let us examine a few possible reasons:

Administrative burden Implementing effective governance requires time, perseverance and the ability to integrate organisational, hierarchical, technical, legal and financial dimensions. These efforts are often perceived as a constraint. While a small SME can sometimes do without it, larger structures do not have that luxury.

The need for skills Governance requires multidisciplinary knowledge. Companies must therefore mobilise their internal resources or call on external expertise. This process certainly represents an investment, but it brings in return increased visibility and greater clarity for all stakeholders.

Will (or lack thereof) In some cases, the absence of governance is a deliberate choice. It allows for complete freedom of action, which appears to be synonymous with agility. In practice, however, it leads to instability, uncertainty and a culture of constant fear.

The dilution of responsibilities Without a clear framework, everyone is responsible… or no one is. This ‘artistic vagueness’ facilitates rapid change, but at the cost of errors, frustrations and conflicts that are difficult to arbitrate. The absence of rules makes it almost impossible to assign objective responsibilities in the event of a breach.

Governance in practice Effective governance should not become a cumbersome administrative machine. Above all, it must answer simple questions :

• Who reports to whom?

• What skills are present at each level (technical, financial, operational, etc.)?

• How should exceptions be handled and specific projects managed?

• What are the escalation mechanisms in the event of a problem?

A collective challenge Governance is not just a legal or technical requirement. Above all, it is a factor in organisational and human stability. In most cases, employees want to know clearly what is expected of them, in what context they are working and how much leeway they have. This need for clarity is universal. Yet some leaders seem to prefer to maintain ambiguity… a choice that undermines trust and collective performance in the long term.

Good governance is not a constraint: it is a prerequisite for lasting success.

Enjoy reading and see you soon.

Recent posts

  • Workspaces: what strategy to adopt

    Since the pandemic, many companies have been experimenting with office design – open plan, remote work, flex office – but often without a clear vision. The result? A bit of everything, but not enough of anything to truly work.

    Designing effective workspaces is not about chasing trends. It requires a strategic approach that considers: • Company culture, • Business activities and market, • employees’ expectations (especially younger generations), • the need for long-term stability. Poor choices create frustration and hidden costs, whereas a clear and consistent strategy can drive both performance and engagement.

    In short : it’s better to take the time to get it right than to rush into quick fixes that don’t last.

  • Internal re-invoicing – Financial logic and an educational gesture

    Internal recharging: an often-overlooked lever In many companies, internal recharging of services is underestimated… or even deliberately ignored. However, it offers two major benefits: • Identify precisely who generates revenue and who bears the costs. • Remind everyone that no resource is free. Without it, some people adjust the strategy to their advantage, obscuring the reality of costs and hindering transparency. ✅ Implementing an internal re-invoicing system means: • Making real costs visible. • Basing decisions on reliable data. • Training teams on the real value of resources. • Objectively comparing competitiveness with the market. Yes, it’s complex to implement. But transparency is the best driver of progress — and ignoring this practice often amounts to ‘rewriting history’ at the expense of collective efficiency.

  • Revitalizing apprenticeships: a challenge for Switzerland

    What if apprenticeships became a choice for the future again?

    In Switzerland, the dual education system is a real national asset. However, it is losing ground to academic courses that are perceived – sometimes wrongly – as more rewarding or promising.

    There are many reasons for this, including a lack of institutional recognition, recruitment bias, social pressure, and cultural influences. But these reasons should not obscure the reality that apprenticeships are a path to excellence that is enriching, progressive, and perfectly suited to the job market. I know this from experience. Having completed an apprenticeship and supplemented it with continuing education, I have been able to build a career that is exciting, fulfilling, and well-paid.

    It is time to give apprenticeships back the place they deserve in our society and to remind ourselves that success does not always come from a lecture hall.

  • Is the 80-20 principle still applicable?

    In an increasingly complex and unpredictable economic world, companies must now provide ‘120% effort for 80% profit’. The famous Pareto principle (80/20) is losing its relevance. Several structural and contextual factors explain this development or must be considered: • Ever more sophisticated products and shorter life cycles • Increased global competition • Explosion of standards and regulatory constraints • Internal organisational complexity • Poorly identified costs and training that is sometimes disconnected from operational realities To remain competitive, organisations must focus on simplification, intelligent delegation and refocusing on the essentials. It is by cultivating efficiency rather than one-upmanship that they will differentiate themselves and ensure their economic strength.

  • A project that is off to a good start…

    In the professional world of projects – whether technical, financial or construction-related – we often hear the saying: ‘A project that starts badly ends badly.’ And it must be said that this is often true. But why not adopt a more positive outlook? After all, ‘a project that starts on the right foot is more likely to end well’: a simple principle that is often overlooked yet proves to be crucial to the success of a project. Without claiming to reveal any new truths, let’s remember that a solid project relies above all on a team of experts, rigorous planning, and in-depth analysis of the challenges, opportunities, and potential difficulties. Large-scale projects must also include a precise risk assessment. These are inevitable – technical, financial, human, and scheduling – and must therefore be anticipated, documented, and, as far as possible, controlled. This approach is integral to a good start: think about success, of course, but also think about risks.

  • Standing out: an art, a doctrine or an obsessive disorder…

    Is standing out an art, a doctrine or an obsessive disorder? This gradation often seems to be ignored by some people and companies.

    The art of standing out In a world that is increasingly standardised, if not standardised and pacified, standing out can be an art. It’s about finding the right niche, the right approach and the right message, even if it means shocking, challenging or disturbing. This dynamic has always existed, but social networks seem to have taken it to the extreme. What was once art can quickly become disorder. The doctrine lies somewhere between these two extremes, institutionalising certain aspects and amplifying others. (…) In conclusion Standing out from the crowd is often an art which, over time, can degenerate into dogma, or even obsessive disorder, threatening the very survival of a company. The resulting blindness prevents any questioning, on pain of exclusion. It all comes down to a subtle balance between strategic vision, ethics and sensitivity, whether some of today’s ‘bulldozers’ like it or not.

  • Pragmatism in the face of Artificial Intelligence (AI)…

    Artificial intelligence has made remarkable inroads into the professional world over the past five years. Most large corporations are now fully exploiting the possibilities offered by this technology, which has been described as ‘revolutionary’ – either through ready-to-use applications or by developing their own internal AI to meet specific needs while ensuring the protection of their strategic data. Towards an inflation of rules and dogmas In a hyperconnected world, norms and standards have become essential to ensure consistency: same causes, same effects. This applies even more so to large international companies, particularly those with direct or indirect links to Anglo-Saxon countries. They are often forced to adopt the laws, directives and standards enacted by the latter. Failure to do so exposes them to costly and complex legal consequences. Some organisations therefore prefer to limit their activities to the local or regional level to avoid these extraterritorial constraints. AI and the rules When we look at the AI tools currently available to the general public, the impression of a ‘jungle’ prevails: sources are rarely cited, personal data can be used for training purposes unless explicitly opposed (often unclear), and some responses are partially censored or formatted according to the rules of the tool’s country of origin (United States, China, etc.). This situation reveals a considerable legal vacuum, born of the rapid pace of technological progress. Legislation is struggling to keep up, and only strong action at the level of states or regional blocs (such as the EU) could bridge this gap. But will they have the power to influence such powerful economic interests? Only time will tell.

Archives

Contact us

Contact from
☛ Don't forget to include an email address or a phone number if you wish to be contacted.